Master the only solitaire variant where every redeal is predictable — learn to think two states ahead and exploit the deterministic redistribution mechanic.
Cruel Solitaire strategy comes down to three pillars: exploit the deterministic redeal by predicting outcomes before they happen, plan every move for its effect on both the current tableau AND the post-redeal state, and time foundation plays strategically rather than greedily. The redeal is not a reset button — it is a transformation function you can control. Every card you move between piles changes the input to that function and therefore changes its output.
Cruel Solitaire begins with 48 cards dealt into 12 piles of 4 cards each, all face-up. The four Aces start on the foundations. You build on foundations in ascending suit sequence and build on tableau piles in descending same-suit sequence, moving only one card at a time. But the mechanic that separates Cruel from every other solitaire variant is its redeal.
When you trigger a redeal, the game collects cards from all 12 piles using a specific, unchanging algorithm: it moves left to right across the piles (pile 1 first, pile 12 last), and within each pile it takes cards from bottom to top. These collected cards form a single ordered sequence. The game then redistributes this sequence into groups of 4, dealing them back into the 12 pile positions. If the total card count isn't divisible by 4 (because some cards have been played to foundations), the last pile receives fewer than 4 cards.
This process is entirely deterministic. There is no shuffling, no randomization, no hidden information. The same pile arrangement will always produce the same redeal result. This is the single most important strategic insight in Cruel: the redeal is a predictable transformation, not a random event. Once you internalize this, the entire game changes. You stop hoping the redeal will help and start engineering the redeal to produce exactly what you need.
Key insight: Think of the redeal as a function: f(pile_state) = new_pile_state. Your job is not to play the game and then redeal hoping for improvement. Your job is to manipulate the input to this function so that the output is what you need. Every move you make is simultaneously a tableau move and an edit to the redeal's input. Master this dual perspective and you will see Cruel in an entirely new light.
Since every redeal is predictable, the strongest Cruel players do not simply play cards and then redeal when stuck. They actively arrange cards before redealing to control what the redistribution produces. This is the highest-skill aspect of Cruel and the primary differentiator between intermediate and expert play.
The core technique is straightforward in concept but demanding in execution: before triggering a redeal, move cards between piles so that the collection algorithm picks them up in an order that produces favorable groupings after redistribution. This means you need to mentally simulate the entire collection-and-redistribution process for your planned pile state. You are effectively solving two puzzles simultaneously — the current tableau and the post-redeal tableau.
Consider a concrete example. Suppose you need the 7 of Hearts to land on top of the 8 of Hearts after the redeal. You know the 8 of Hearts is currently in pile 6. After collection and redistribution, you need the 7 of Hearts to end up as the top card of whatever pile the 8 of Hearts lands in. Working backward: if the 8 of Hearts will be the third card dealt to pile N, then the 7 of Hearts needs to be the fourth card dealt to pile N — meaning it must immediately follow the 8 in the collected sequence. You can achieve this by placing the 7 in a position where the collection algorithm picks it up right after the 8.
Strategic trade-off: Pre-redeal manipulation often requires making moves that worsen the current tableau in exchange for a better post-redeal state. This feels counterintuitive — why would you break a useful sequence just to improve the redeal? Because the redeal will rebuild the entire tableau anyway. The current state is temporary; the post-redeal state is what you will actually play next. Optimize for the future, not the present.
In most solitaire games — from FreeCell to Klondike — playing cards to the foundation as early as possible is almost always correct. Foundations are safe storage that reduce tableau complexity. In Cruel, this intuition is dangerously misleading. Foundation timing is one of the subtlest and most important strategic decisions in the game.
The reason is pile sizes. When you play a card to the foundation, it leaves the tableau permanently. This reduces the total card count, which changes how the redistribution algorithm groups cards during the next redeal. A pile that would have received 4 cards now receives 3, or the last pile shrinks from 3 cards to 2. This ripple effect can shift the position of every card in the post-redeal tableau — sometimes improving it, sometimes destroying a carefully engineered arrangement.
The most common mistake is aggressive foundation building in the mid-game. Early on, when piles are all 4 cards and the redistribution is uniform, foundation plays are relatively safe — removing one card from 48 causes a minor shift. But when you have 30 cards across 12 piles with uneven distribution, removing even one card can cause a cascade of position changes. At this stage, you must simulate the post-redeal state both with and without the foundation play to determine which produces a more workable tableau.
Common mistake: Automatically playing every available card to the foundation. In Cruel, greedy foundation building is one of the fastest ways to lose a winnable deal. The card you play to the foundation might be the exact card you needed on the tableau to set up a critical pre-redeal arrangement. Before every foundation play, ask: “Is this card more useful here or on the foundation?” The answer is not always obvious.
The most advanced skill in Cruel Solitaire is mental simulation — predicting the exact post-redeal tableau from the current pile state. This is not guesswork. Because the redeal algorithm is deterministic and the rules are simple (collect left-to-right, bottom-to-top; redistribute in groups of 4), the outcome is fully calculable. Expert Cruel players perform this calculation before every redeal, and the best players evaluate multiple candidate pre-redeal arrangements to find the one that produces the most favorable outcome.
The simulation process works in three steps. First, mentally collect all cards using the algorithm: scan pile 1 bottom-to-top, then pile 2 bottom-to-top, and so on through pile 12. This gives you the collected sequence. Second, divide this sequence into groups of 4 — the first 4 cards form pile 1, the next 4 form pile 2, and so on. Third, examine the resulting piles for useful configurations: same-suit descending pairs on top, foundation-playable cards accessible, and piles that support your overall building plan.
With practice, you do not need to simulate the entire 12-pile redistribution. Focus on the cards that matter most — the ones you need for foundation plays or critical same-suit connections. Track where those specific cards sit in the collected sequence and where they will land after redistribution. If a key card ends up buried in the middle of a new pile, consider what pre-redeal moves would shift it to the top instead.
Key insight: Mental simulation is a trainable skill, not an innate talent. Start by simulating just the first 2-3 piles after a redeal. As your speed improves, extend to 5-6 piles. Most games are decided by what happens in a handful of critical piles, so partial simulation is often sufficient. You do not need to predict all 12 piles perfectly — just the ones that contain your key cards.
Cruel's tableau building rule — same-suit descending, one card at a time — is far more restrictive than games like FreeCell (any suit descending) or Yukon (alternating color descending with group moves). You can only place a card on another card of the same suit that is exactly one rank higher. The 9 of Clubs can only go on the 10 of Clubs — not the 10 of Spades, not the 10 of Hearts, not the Jack of Clubs. This extreme restriction means valid moves are rare and each one is strategically significant.
Pile management in Cruel revolves around maintaining useful same-suit descending sequences on top of piles while keeping the overall pile structure favorable for the next redeal. A well-managed pile has its most useful cards on top (accessible for moves or foundation plays) and its least useful cards on the bottom (where they will be collected first during the redeal and redistributed to early piles).
Empty piles deserve special attention. When a pile is emptied, it remains empty until the next redeal, when it may or may not receive cards depending on the total count. An empty pile contributes nothing to the collected sequence, which means every card from subsequent piles shifts earlier in the redistribution. This shift effect is significant — one empty pile shifts every subsequent pile's contribution by one position in the collected sequence, which can cascade into completely different pile compositions after redistribution.
Strategic trade-off: Building a long same-suit descending sequence on a single pile feels productive — you are organizing cards in order. But in Cruel, a long pile creates a rigid block in the collected sequence that limits your redistribution options. Sometimes it is better to keep cards spread across multiple short piles for maximum pre-redeal flexibility, even though the current tableau looks messier.
Cruel and La Belle Lucie are often grouped together as “redeal solitaire games,” and they share surface similarities: both use piles of cards with restricted building rules, and both allow redeals that reorganize the tableau. But the nature of their redeals creates fundamentally different strategic games. Understanding this difference is essential for players who enjoy both variants.
La Belle Lucie's redeal is a random shuffle — cards are collected and redistributed in a new random order. This means pre-redeal planning is impossible. You cannot engineer a favorable redeal because you have no idea what the redeal will produce. La Belle Lucie strategy is therefore about maximizing your position before each redeal and then adapting to whatever the redeal gives you. It rewards flexibility, pattern recognition, and the ability to spot new opportunities in a reshuffled tableau.
Cruel's deterministic redeal flips this on its head. You know exactly what the redeal will produce, so you can (and must) plan for it. Cruel rewards calculation, simulation, and precise execution. The game is more cerebral and less reactive — you are engineering outcomes rather than adapting to them. This makes Cruel feel more like a logic puzzle and La Belle Lucie more like a card game.
The biggest mindset shift between these two games: in La Belle Lucie, you play the hand you are dealt and hope the redeal improves things. In Cruel, you design the hand you will be dealt. Players who excel at La Belle Lucie are often strong at reading new board positions quickly. Players who excel at Cruel are often strong at planning and calculation. Both are rewarding, but they exercise very different cognitive muscles. If you enjoy the predictability and depth of FreeCell, Cruel's deterministic redeal will feel like a natural fit.
Put your Cruel Solitaire knowledge to the test. Play free online Cruel Solitaire with unlimited redeals and instant new deals.
Put these strategies into practice online for free
Complete rules, setup, and move guide
Quick tips for all skill levels
Strategy for Cruel's random-redeal cousin
Strategy guide for the classic FreeCell game
Explore 20+ solitaire variants and find your next game